- Joined
- October 7, 2011
- Messages
- 1,666
[video=youtube;86XmQra5WMU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86XmQra5WMU&feature=colike[/video]
[video=youtube;6wXkI4t7nuc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc[/video]Yeah the video must have been taken down. Sorry about that.
The speaker, a well spoken criminal defence attorney, illustrates the many ways your innocent statements can be used against you in unexpected ways; he then yield the rest of his time to a detective who talks about interrogation tecniqus.Can someone summarize what that 48 minute video basically says? I can pretty much guess, but before I head off on one of my rants, I'd like to know what I'm discussing. :banghead:
One day the police will come for my private guns, and soon after I as a soldier will come for their police guns. Disarmament doesn't stop with regular people, anti-gun needs police disarmed as well. Only the political militia and the military will be armed, should they get their way.Diesel,
Oh yes. I've seen my share of "bad" cops for sure. The worst ones are the guys who get offended because you did something on "their" street or in "their" city. Gimme a break.
The guy thought he had a real criminal and perhaps a real arrest but it turned out to be a simple guy open carrying a gun. Now his ego is deflated and he feels he needs to get something on you. Yep, been there, got the t-shirt. Just quiet up and let him rant and rave until it dawns on him that he's the only one making noise.
Luckily for me, I play the game and they let me go. I don't try to educate them unless they ask. Only one has asked so far.
The worst one so far is a local city cop who absolutely HATES the idea of a mere civilian openly carrying a sidearm.
Oh well, deal with it. It's the LAW.
AD
Stylus,The only way to prevent your innocent and well meaning words from being misunderstood is to simply not say anything at all.
I was thinking of this thread earlier and stopped by http://www.handgunlaw.us/states/ohio.pdf. I have a family member in OH who likes to make trouble, a regular drama queen. Should she call the cops on me for OC one day I like to think I'm ready in knowledge. With that in mind. I heard somewhere that in OH you have to inform a home owner if you're CC'ing before entering their house. Do you know if this is true? I haven't been able to find a law on it either way.Stylus,
On this we totally agree. One of the most used "techniques" in a traffic stop, or in my case, an OC stop, is to just to have the officer just stand there without saying anything. Most people will then start to blab on and on about something, just to fill the void.
Nope. Just stand there and count your teeth or something. The officer is now waiting for you to "offer up" anything he can use as he's got nothing on you at this time. This has been pretty standard with the last three stops.
Not a big deal. Just stand there and wait for them to hand your license back, usually with some kind of dire warning or some edict that you shouldn't be scaring the citizens, as they like to call them. Evidently seeing a police car in a "citizen's" mirror doesn't scare any of them, just me with a properly holstered Glock on a bike.
AD
Sent from the Glock Range Bag iPad using Tapatalk and a screwdriver
No police will go after your guns. If confiscation happens itll be non Americans who carry out the act.One day the police will come for my private guns, and soon after I as a soldier will come for their police guns. Disarmament doesn't stop with regular people, anti-gun needs police disarmed as well. Only the political militia and the military will be armed, should they get their way.
Confiscation has been ongoing for a long time. From the GCA to modern 'assult weapon' bans. Search warrants for firearms have gone out in CT. The denial you express here was also expressed in Australia, the UK and pre-WW2 Germany. Yes, LEOs do confiscate in every single instance the State is given half a chance.No police will go after your guns. If confiscation happens itll be non Americans who carry out the act.
Shoot Strait!
Seems we are talking about 2 different types of confiscation. Im talking about the 'big one' the one thats gonna start another revolution. History repeats itself, and its inevitable that this will happen.Confiscation has been ongoing for a long time. From the GCA to modern 'assult weapon' bans. Search warrants for firearms have gone out in CT. The denial you express here was also expressed in Australia, the UK and pre-WW2 Germany. Yes, LEOs do confiscate in every single instance the State is given half a chance.
There is only one 'kind' of confiscation, and that's confiscation. If someone stabs you slowly is that any different than being stabbed quickly? Same damage, same peril. The speed in which it occurs being irrelevant. Guns are being confiscated gradually so as to avoid the revolution. Even Australia, the UK didn't have a 'big one'. What confiscation looks like is a gradual drying-out of various guns, starting with those which can be most easily vilified and moving inward. After 'assault weapons' bans come bans on handguns, and the Left will cry "you can still own rifles so it's not an infringement". Ever more progressive restrictions on rifles follow, until one day there's only a handful of guns you can own, and never anything which can compete with military arms.Seems we are talking about 2 different types of confiscation. Im talking about the 'big one' the one thats gonna start another revolution. History repeats itself, and its inevitable that this will happen.
Shoot Strait!
I hear the latest anti-gun push out of California target 'sniper rifles'.Very well stated Stylus I could not have said it better. There are states that basically have outlawed .22 rifles because they have tubular magazines that hold more then 10 rounds.